|
The most endearing
phrase used to describe the domestic dog is, “Man’s best
friend.” This is a title that has been earned over thousands
of years in countries all over the world. From the
companion of kings, to driving sheep with the shepherd, from
tracking game beside the hunter, to guarding the home and
family of his master, our “best friend” has filled many
roles faithfully and willingly. Whatever the dog’s role was
to be, it was defined by his human friend who then went on
to teach (train) the dog for that role. In this process, the
dog’s needs were also met and the relationship flourished.
This very special
relationship continues to this day and is the reason most
people continue to bring dogs into their homes. For
their part, the dog is more than happy to fulfill the role,
"companion for the family," and with just a small amount of
guidance, understanding and structure on the owners part,
the dog will hold up his end of that relationship.
The
desire for companionship is something that is shared by both
the dog and his owner and does not need to be trained into
the dog. What is needed however is training that will help
him understand the boundaries, rules and expectations with
which he must abide. Once we bring a
dog into our home, our lives are forever changed. He starts
off living in a small corner of our house and ends up
occupying a very large part of our hearts.
If you consider the history man
and dog share, the millennia spent developing literally
hundreds of breeds to perform thousands of specialized jobs
and the sheer success of that relationship, you must
conclude mankind knows how to live with, raise and train the
dogs entrusted to his stewardship. This body of
knowledge has been growing as more information, tools and
ideas (having proven their worth) have been added to it. |
Approximately 20 - 30 years ago we saw
the beginnings of a shift which has begun the alarming
trends I mentioned earlier. The dog culture, steeped
in it's rich history, began to see the arrival of hordes of
new idealistic "trainers" claiming to offer
the latest of what science has to offer. Even though
their claims were (and continue to be) false and misleading,
they persist with an almost ideological zeal. Like any
malignancy, their ideology has been growing rapidly while
contributing almost nothing to the overall welfare of the
body and ultimately can prove fatal.
Whereas this body of knowledge (living
with, raising and training dogs) has been growing for
generations by adding new ideas, tools and information
THAT HAVE PROVEN THEIR WORTH, this new wave seeks to
limit, ban and destroy. Practitioners of this ideology
seem to have generally coalesced under the "Positive Dog
Training" label of which the more radical elements have
clearly been influenced by the push to humanize pets and the
"Animal Rights" agenda. Rather than attempt to prove
the value of their ideology through a demonstration of
better, more reliable results, they attempt to take their
cause to the legislatures and have laws passed to make all
but themselves illegitimate.
Why take such a tactic? Because
the results simply aren't there. If they were then
traditional, balanced dog trainers (being a very pragmatic
and eclectic group) would have embraced the positive dog
training ideal - sort of the "build a better mousetrap and
the world will beat a path to your door" principle.
The fact is however, what we see today is a 25 year failed
experiment - contrast that to the thousands of years of
success. If you then want to maintain such a
narrow-minded, idealistic, moralistic cause and you cannot
compete (because of a failing product) then you don't
compete. Instead, you attack and attempt to abolish
the successful product so you can replace it with your own
offering. |